Jennifer
01-04-2002, 06:39 PM
"It would have been nice, referee friends, to have seen Oklahoma and
Connecticut play without ceaseless whistles. Even so, that game indicated that
while Oklahoma may indeed be the third-best team, there's a undeniable gap
between the next best and the top two."
This comment seems a bit premature. If UT beats Uconn, then yes, OK. But suppose Uconn beats Tenn by 10 or more. Does that mean there is an "undeniable gap between the next best and the top two"? I think not. All OU's loss means is that Uconn is a better team than OU right now; it has nothing to do w/ how TN figures in. Oh wait, it is TN we're talking about...nevermind. http://hoopscoop.net/ubb/smile.gif
Of course, if OU doesn't take care of a tough Tech team in Lubbock, then this is a moot point. http://hoopscoop.net/ubb/smile.gif
The complete article is at http://espn.go.com/ncw/columns/voepel/1305137.html
Connecticut play without ceaseless whistles. Even so, that game indicated that
while Oklahoma may indeed be the third-best team, there's a undeniable gap
between the next best and the top two."
This comment seems a bit premature. If UT beats Uconn, then yes, OK. But suppose Uconn beats Tenn by 10 or more. Does that mean there is an "undeniable gap between the next best and the top two"? I think not. All OU's loss means is that Uconn is a better team than OU right now; it has nothing to do w/ how TN figures in. Oh wait, it is TN we're talking about...nevermind. http://hoopscoop.net/ubb/smile.gif
Of course, if OU doesn't take care of a tough Tech team in Lubbock, then this is a moot point. http://hoopscoop.net/ubb/smile.gif
The complete article is at http://espn.go.com/ncw/columns/voepel/1305137.html