swok34
12-12-2002, 06:11 PM
I've heard that UW-Green Bay has become a formidable opponent,
here's the scoop from: http://www.womenscollegehoops.com/picks12.1112.02.htm
Kansas State at UW-Green Bay
Has upset written all over it as potent, but still young KSU better keep their eyes on upset minded Phoenix who have won six in a row and make a living off of beating the "big boys." Ohlde and Wecker can do a lot, but assuming Phoenix are themselves, Laurie will need to step up too. Watch out, KSU 70-68.
They stand at 6-1 and beat TCU on their home court. They've also beaten Miami (FL) who was pretty good last year, not familiar with their team this year. Though I don't understand
"beating the big boys"....they've played Wisconsin, Ohio State, Oregon, SE Missouri State, Illinois.....which one of these teams are they calling "big boys"? Wisconsin is down, Illnois is terrible, IMO (and they lost to them), SE MO ST...not a big boy,
Oregon, not big boy status, IMO....and I'm not familiar with Ohio State at all.
[This message has been edited by swok34 (edited 12-12-2002).]
here's the scoop from: http://www.womenscollegehoops.com/picks12.1112.02.htm
Kansas State at UW-Green Bay
Has upset written all over it as potent, but still young KSU better keep their eyes on upset minded Phoenix who have won six in a row and make a living off of beating the "big boys." Ohlde and Wecker can do a lot, but assuming Phoenix are themselves, Laurie will need to step up too. Watch out, KSU 70-68.
They stand at 6-1 and beat TCU on their home court. They've also beaten Miami (FL) who was pretty good last year, not familiar with their team this year. Though I don't understand
"beating the big boys"....they've played Wisconsin, Ohio State, Oregon, SE Missouri State, Illinois.....which one of these teams are they calling "big boys"? Wisconsin is down, Illnois is terrible, IMO (and they lost to them), SE MO ST...not a big boy,
Oregon, not big boy status, IMO....and I'm not familiar with Ohio State at all.
[This message has been edited by swok34 (edited 12-12-2002).]